Since I know we have some posters on here who tend to sway towards the Republican side, I have had a few discussions lately with some people from both sides of the old political world and wondering what some of you all think (maybe not just the Republicans, but particularly them)
1)Kilgore cost himself the election. Jerry had the election won. A month or more ago, it was probably in the bag, but the overwhelming negative views on his campaign ads and his performances in the debates hurt him and probably took a 5-7% win and turned it into a loss.
2)The some of the ones who did his campaign ads (particularly the Hitler reference) was the same group that did the Bush ads attacking John Kerry (the Vietnam ones).
Now I can believe the first point, because like I said, the negative nature and lack of answers and only attacks caused me to change my vote, because I really wanted to vote for someone from this area (a governor from this area while it may not have changed a thing, was worth the chance), but the second one, well if thats true, someone should smack whomever was in charge of his campaign. When Dubya and company made those ads (or endorsed them, influenced them, whatever the respective case was), that was when Kerry was able to gain the most ground and pulled even with Bush in most polls.





Bookmarks